hogan scontate which is also described in detail in Zhang account had August 21

(Reporter ching-kuo lin) Wang borrowed 50,000 yuan to the lover, write IOU three drafts, Third Edition IOUs were lovers take the results to court broke up a few years later, the debt becomes 150,000 ! Wang was overwhelmed this nobody knows for sure, but fortunately the judge carefully checked, found out the truth. This morning reporter learned that the plaintiff has been withdrawal.
 
A month ago, Wang Lee will be taken to court, he asked Wang repayment of loans 150,000 yuan, and Wang presented three handwritten IOU. "I obviously just borrowed $ 50,000, how to become a 150,000,scarpe hogan outlet, also has IOU " Wang received the respondent material perplexing, indeed see IOU own handwriting, more ignorant, thinking it before understood.
 
Originally, the two former lovers, during Wang borrowed 50,000 yuan to Lee for the car. Because never before had to borrow money, never wrote IOUs, Wang repeatedly wrote three, let Lee pick the one most suitable, the results of the three IOU Lee are away. Because two people in love, Wang did not care, did not realize that breaking up a few years later, Lee actually take a big fuss.
 
Trial, Lee and Wang had a relationship admit, when lending money to Wang, but they did lend a total of 15 million. Judge carefully reviewed and found Lee provided three promissory note loan amount is $ 50,000, inscribed date is the same day, each IOU individual differences in wording.
 
Thus, the judge repeatedly asked Lee loan amount, purpose, location, method of payment, sources, and why the same day loan write three IOUs, with or without witnesses, etc. At the same time, the judge told Lee, if a false statement to verify its existence, will hold its corresponding legal responsibility. Lee repeatedly questioning the judge, before and after presentation varies, Wang eventually admitted to lend actually only $ 50,000.
 
After Wang returned five million, Lee withdrawal,basket nike pas cher, and the originals are returned to Wang IOU. "After the signature really have to be careful, pay attention to keeping the IOU notes." Wang spot will be all torn IOU.
 
Judge tips
 
Haidian court judge 柏梅 remind you, is that people borrowing from relatives and friends usual emergency mode, because the relationship with each other better, the borrower during the inevitable move freely, even while ignoring many details due to be grateful. But in fact,chapeau hip hop, personal autographs, personal data Article writing is a very important instrument of information, should be used with caution, be careful of, so as not to be used by unscrupulous others, suffered unnecessary trouble.
 
IOU Mystery 2
 
In the end by a few money
 
Borrowing is also a very skilled "knowledge." How to play IOU  What form of loans  If the credentials are not preserved well, it is likely to eat Yaba Kui.
 
Recently this case together.
 
Two versions of the story
 
Wang and Zhang are familiar with each other because of business dealings.
 
According to Zhang speaking, in May 2011 and in June, Wang Zhang twice to borrowing 100,000 yuan, Zhang are in the form of cash to lend money to Wang, Wang, Zhang is issued to two Zhang says "this whole by Zhang 100,000 yuan ($ 100,000 whole), in October 2011 before the return of" IOU.
 
August 2011, Wang returned to the bank transfer Zhang wherein a sum of 100,000 yuan loan, and May IOU to lay back. In January of this year, Zhang Wang Recall to June 2011 loan,cinture diesel, Wang refused to return, saying the loan has also, the two sides dispute, but unfortunately Zhang Chaoyang court prosecution.
 
Only an IOU
 
The trial, Zhang took out in June 2011 promissory note, asked Wang to return 100,000 yuan loan. Wang has said that the loan has been further and come up with a bank transfer slip.
 
Meanwhile, Wang also apply to the court for the transfer of Wang and Zhang ICBC account transaction details in August 2011, which is also described in detail in Zhang account had August 21, 2011, Wang received into the account 100,000 yuan.
 
But Zhang told the judge, Wang to the money he borrowed two, Wang August repayments 100 000, he gave Wang a promissory note,cinture ermenegildo zegna, and now his hand left an IOU.
 
The request was rejected
 
Court held that, depending on the transfer of documents and transaction details submitted by banks Wang, Wang can be identified money to pay 100,000 yuan Zhang. While Zhang said the money is repaid a loan which, however, only an IOU Zhang hands, and no bank transfer records,new balance femme, you can not prove the existence of two pen borrowing. The court dismissed the claims of Zhang.
 
Zhang felt too much injustice, and obviously two loans have, how to get the other side to get the forward to become a loan of  Zhang felt fell into a trap.
 
The case due to insufficient evidence, even if Zhang said is true, he can only eat Yaba Kui.
 
Prosecutors Tips
 
In today's society, a lot of money transactions are carried out through bank transfer, the transfer slip and bank transaction records will be identified in court as evidence of transfer of funds borrowed. How to avoid in real life Zhang this happen
 
First,cappelli new york, large borrowers do not pay in cash, and try by bank transfer,felpe abercrombie, bank transactions can be used as evidence in litigation advantage; secondly, if the cash payment and other forms of borrowing, to sign a loan agreement or allow the borrower to write IOU, IOU to write the contents of the agreement or detail, and not in the other payments will be returned IOUs, but to give people write receipt of repayment,woolrich uomo ebay, and write clearly in receipt of that paragraph also when borrowed. Finally, in the loan dealings, attention to the preservation of all evidence to be retained.
 
Newspaper reporter Zhang Lei
&#160,tiffany orecchini;
IOU Mystery 3
 
There are colleagues not owe IOU
 
The Court does not recognize court debt collection
 
(Reporter ching-kuo lin) Many people think that when you lend money to someone else, the other side write IOUs have protection, it is not. This morning reporter learned from the Haidian court, "creditor" Mike took a colleague IOU lawsuit for money, it was a court decision dismissed.
 
Defendant Wang colleagues. Wang said the court pointed to the promissory note, Mike to urgently grounds to he borrowed 30,000 yuan in cash, and wrote this IOU. Can afterwards, Mike investment loss, refused to pay back the money, but unfortunately only with his own court.
 
On court, though Mike recognition IOU is to write, but it does not recognize the relationship between the two sides of lending. He said that after the IOUs issued, Wang not actually borrowing in Li repeated requests, Wang does not return IOU.
 
After the judge asked, Wang said the cash was given, but was unable to provide evidence of actual payment, and can not explain the source of borrowing from. Ultimately, the court dismissed the claims of Wang's.
 
Judge tips
&#160,louboutin online france;
侯艳蓉 judge Haidian court to draw attention, the occurrence of lending relationship must have two conditions: loan desirable, if the borrower issued IOUs, IOUs to the lender and the like; actual lending behavior, such as the borrower's receipt issued to the lender, the lender to the borrower by the bank remittance vouchers. "If the lender can not provide evidence of the existence of both lenders and borrowers to borrow desirable, while lenders have actually fulfilled the loan obligations, then the lawsuit would be difficult to get support for the court."
 
Houyan Rong said the judge, judicial practice, evidence IOUs, the repayment agreement,police lunette de soleil, repayment plan, usually with a more direct proof effect. After "So, the lender will deliver loans borrowers may require the borrower to issue IOUs to its repayment plan, repayment agreement. In this case, the lender simply by virtue of the above evidence,hogan rebel, it is possible to request the court to protect their legitimate rights and interests. "J151
 
IOU Mystery 4
 
Nobody knows for sure bring the situation changed repeatedly
 
No debt situation with cable woman was dismissed
 
(Reporter ching-kuo lin) woman Xiaoqi (pseudonym) derailed by her husband Mr. Wu later swept out, and lovers living together, Mr. Wu (a pseudonym) angrily claims "moral damages" to rival lover Xiaoqi said that just work for advance the section, who knows they also broke up soon, "throw good money after bad," the prosecution lover Xiaoqi then demand for payment. This morning reporter learned from the Haidian court, as a lover not admit the lack of evidence of Xiaoqi eventually suffered a defeat.
 
Trial,cinture burberry, the plaintiff Xiaoqi aggrieved that she had married women know Jill (a pseudonym), the under Jill pursued, the two gradually produce feelings. Her husband divorced her and found Mr. Wu. After that, he and Jill Xiaoqi live together. But Mr. Wu believes Jill to their cause irreparable moral damage, thus requiring Jill to pay him 70,000 yuan in compensation, or else every day to Jill's units downtown.
 
Xiaoqi said, because she consciously wrong on this issue, on the first payment of 20,000 yuan for Jill to her ex-husband. The remaining 50,000 yuan, after Jill wrote IOU,golden goose homme, Xiaoqi also advanced to the ex-husband.
 
However, the lack of emotional foundation, Xiaoqi and Jill's feelings gradually slowed, also broke up not long after. Xiaoqi lost family and love, then took the IOU and Jill court,louis vuitton bracelets, ask for his own "advance" of 50,000 yuan.
 
But in court,cinture louis vuitton, Jill does not endorse Xiaoqi prosecution facts to the court stated two reasons: first, he did not promise to pay moral damages Mr. Xiang Wu, if any, due to violation of public order and morals, can not get protection of the law; second, in the persecution under Xiaoqi parents, he expressed willingness to resolve to live together with Xiaoqi written IOU, but Xiaoqi not actually pay 50,000 yuan loan,chapeau diamond, the two sides did real lending relationship .
 
Xiaoqi this inquiry judge, but that there is no evidence of Xiaoqi Jill agreed to pay 50,000 yuan for mental damages,louboutin soldes, can not prove you have 50,000 yuan on behalf of Mr. Fu Geiwu Jill.
 
Finally, the Court based on existing evidence does not prove a real and effective lending relationship between the two parties on the grounds, ruling rejected the prosecution Xiaoqi.
 
Judge tips
 
On the case, the judge Haidian court Houyan Rong believes Xiaoqi not actually provide evidence of the loan, therefore, according to "Civil Law" to determine "who advocate who burden of proof" principle, Xiaoqi should bear the burden of proof can not be legal consequences.
 
Houyan Rong judge said,cappelli last kings, in recent years, due to emotional debt caused by private lending disputes became varied, with old lovers between between wife with three small, there are between husband and wife, but also the in-laws, her parents and daughter-in-law between. Faced with the complicated social situation, law and can be adjusted in fact solve little, more or rely on each person's moral constraints.
 
(Original title: IOU mystery was broken first love "Bel" black)
相关的主题文章：

  
   http://bp.ctxlsj.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=13740988&fromuid=99538
  
   http://www.quanshungroup.cn/index.asp
  
   http://zxs.hdcz.gov.cn/Review.asp?NewsID=82
  
   http://www.nj-bridge.com/ad/Review.asp?NewsID=486
  
   http://www.elimfanyi.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=5042
  
   http://www.chaoshi.yuxa.com/news/html/?8489.html
  
   http://www.2winbank.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=16309958&fromuid=4147
  
   http://www.nxslky.cn/Review.asp?NewsID=721