Market News (Reporter Leiqiang) after the couple agreed to a divorce,adidas, husband and wife does not know a taxi is not counted as part of property. Until her ex-husband and his second wife and married after the death of their only know the existence of taxis. However, when it knows, this car has increased from Xiali taxi car replaced 桑坦纳. For car and taxi market value of the current taxi operating permits very impressive,converse basse, both before and after the wife playing a lawsuit. Recently, the province since the first taxi franchise property dispute despite the court of first instance,magasin adidas, still then turmoil, Hefei Intermediate People's Court formally accepted the case.
Wife to fight two cars do not give
The plaintiff alleged that certain Shen, Yao Moumou with her ex-husband was formerly the marital relationship, the purchase of a taxi during a joint live operation, August 2,peuterey sito ufficiale, 2006, the parties agreed to a divorce, and in the agreement on jointly owned property were segmentation. After Yao Moumou and 凌某某 got married died in February 2009 asking them to give up the Shen certain taxi division of property when it learned during its Moumou divorce conceal this car out of the car . Now, taxi operations by the Ling Moumou possession and get the benefit. Shen certain that the divorce agreement when Yao Moumou in concealing its existence taxi. And Ling Moumou taxi and get the benefit of actual possession, violated her legal property ownership, it is taken to court,hollister italia, asked Ling Moumou return taxi and taxi operating permits, and return the car models 6000 yuan income.
Ling Moumou defendant argued, Shen Moumou certain and during marriage purchase taxi operations, knowing that the plaintiff should have the common property of the two sides of the taxi system,asics gel saga, so the two sides are not above the division of property upon divorce, not Yao Moumou hide common property. And Yao Moumou willed, requested that the right person is changed to taxi operators Ling, so the above should be the right to operate a taxi and legitimate heir. Another said the taxi was replaced by former leased vehicle updated 桑坦纳 凌某某 by car, while the plaintiff was not funded. Meanwhile,hogan interactive uomo, Ling Moumou request the return of property that the plaintiff has exceeded the statute of limitations of two years. Accordingly, the defendant Ling Moumou that the plaintiff requested its return taxi and taxi operating permits, and return the car models 6000 yuan income, no factual and legal basis.
Operating profit is the root certificate lawsuit
 ,spaccio woolrich bologna;
It is understood that the value of the provincial capital of taxi operating permits already far exceeds the value of taxi itself. According to insiders, in the provincial capital, a taxi operating permits transfer price already exceeded several hundred thousand dollars, in case the war continued between the parties on the fundamental reason is that the taxi operating permits competition. Yaohai District Court of First Instance that, when Yao Moumou Shen certain agreement with the divorce, did not split the taxi and operating permits and operating income, and operating permits Yao Moumou vehicle business owner, Yao's death The vehicle is actually occupied by the defendant,peuterey, operations management and obtain revenue, the facts are clear. Yao Moumou car and Shen certain parties to jointly owned property,chapeau nba, Xiali taxis should be used as the plaintiff and Yao Moumou jointly owned property division. Plaintiff and Yao Moumou divorce agreement did not dividing the property, the plaintiff claims that the omission divided accordingly all owned by all of its property and not divided, no factual and legal basis. Further, the property division after omission,louboutin pigalle noire, because in the course of operation reasonable wear and tear and the loss, the plaintiff requested the return of property after re-invested updated Santana taxi,ed hardy bracelets, car after the plaintiff has not updated property investment, which the update was Sang Tanna taxi without lawful rights and interests, so the plaintiff request for the return of the vehicle,peuterey uomo nuovo, no factual and legal basis.
The court also believes the plaintiff claims refund request on the taxi operating permits, the court said that the taxi operating permits after the plaintiff and Yao Moumou divorce to go,air max pas cher, and the taxi operating permits updated 桑坦纳 cars made after registration of common property and the plaintiff has no relevance during its existence, and Yao Moumou marriage, so the plaintiff on the basis of co-ownership of jointly owned property,hogan scarpe interactive donna, the return of property to the defendant claims, without basis in fact. The plaintiff demanded the right to operate as a taxi request the return of illegal possession of property, property and non-property is clearly contrary to the taxi business permission. Accordingly,woolrich outlet online, the Court of First Instance judgment dismissed the plaintiff's claim.
The nature of the right to operate again into the focus of controversy
After the verdicts, Shen certain first instance verdict, immediately filed an appeal to the Hefei Intermediate People's Court. In the above, certain that the sink was Xiali taxi is jointly owned property, so there is no problem with 凌某某 of segmentation. Meanwhile, in the jointly owned property, the car belongs to leak points, but also led to her ex-husband Yao Moumou deliberately concealed, so under the law, its proposed "regardless" and all returned in full compliance with the law.
 ,boss;
Meanwhile, Shen certain noted in the complaint, only continue to use proprietary in the original number plate "license" in order to call a taxi car, taxi service life of 8 years, is due in September 2010,cappelli nba, so Court of First Instance finds that the loss of the responsibility should be borne by 凌某某. Meanwhile,fendi lunette de soleil, Shen certain that now Santana is only on the basis of the original Xiali car, continue to use the original plate and operating permits, to the road, so it should still be the car and operating permit legitimate owners.
Yesterday, reporters learned from the Hefei Intermediate People's Court, since the plaintiff Shen certain first instance verdict,basket adidas, the Court of appeal, Hefei Intermediate People's Court after a review has been made a formal decision on admissibility. Specific hearing date will be scheduled for a decision.
相关的主题文章：