标题: chaussures adidas but not involving public teacher' [打印本页] 作者: yffo51bx8f0 时间: 2015-10-12 04:28:15 标题: chaussures adidas but not involving public teacher'
Judge: personal privacy and public interests may conflict, the executive should take the initiative to determine whether to open
Get information about teacher qualifications including their health information denied,chapeau miami heat, parents sued a children Baiyun District School Board. Court of First Instance, the teachers involved in health information privacy,chapeau 47brand, not public. Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court of second instance is that the teachers' health benefits related to children and parents, commuted be made public.
Show parents sued the Board of Education rejected Teacher Information
2013, Baiyun District Canad kindergarten parents find child health is wrong to sneak into the park unannounced visits found that the food is really great question. Parents pay the expensive tuition angry,collana tiffany, and kindergartens expand representations.
 ,sweat hollister;
In this process,jogging asics, many parents find qualified foreign teachers in kindergarten or there are problems, proposed school foreign teachers to view related information. Baiyun District Board of Education after receiving the complaint, the parents had to reply to hire teachers and so on compliance audits.
Parents are still the heart questioned. Ms Fong to submit information disclosure Baiyun District Education Bureau, to get clear information on both: Canad foreign experts Qualification nursery material; the park the last four years of foreign teachers, including China residency, qualifications and information physical examination material.
 ,jordan noir;
May 2014,juicy bracciali, Baiyun District School Board said she will not accept the application. Ms. Fong then taken to court.
First instance: EDB responsibility to save the information disclosed
Two years later, the follow-up to the second food safety incidents are still quietly fermentation. During the trial, Baiyun District Education Bureau still argued that he was not making organ of information, Ms. Fang should the Guangdong Provincial Foreign Affairs Office of the Guangdong Provincial Bureau of Foreign Experts and apply it to the information disclosed.
However, the Court of First Instance, according to the provisions of "People's Republic of China Government Information Disclosure Ordinance", the government information executive produced by making the government responsible for the executive information disclosure; the executive government information obtained from citizens, legal persons or other organizations,outlet woolrich bologna, save the government by the executive in charge of information disclosure.
So understand, storing information units also have public responsibilities. The court found that the kindergarten to the competent authority, the Canad Baiyun District School Board has submitted material Qualification foreign experts, also submitted in 2011 to 2013 foreign teachers, and other related materials,chrome hearts lunette de soleil, Baiyun District School Board also saved files. Thus,escarpin louboutin pas cher, there is a public responsibility of the council.
Second instance: personal privacy of public interest should be made public
Next,chapeau polo, the case focused Miss Yu Fang appeal whether all can open Press information disclosure regulations: "the administration may not be disclosed involving state secrets, commercial secrets, personal privacy, government information,moncler soldes, however, consent of the rightholder or the administrative authority that the non-disclosure might have a significant impact on the public interest involving commercial secrets or individual. government information privacy may be made public. "
The Court thus analyzed teacher health examination material of privacy,woolrich outlet roma, not publicly, quashing the answer Baiyun District School Board, and ordered to meet Miss Fang apply for most public, but not public health checks and other information.
Baiyun District School Board appealed. Ms. Fang insisted that the health of teachers and the virtues taught by a serious impact on children's physical and mental health, their right to know.
After the second trial, the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court upheld the trial court's decision to be made public, and the adoption of appeal Ms Fong, the commuted increase public nursery teacher's health status information, but not involving public teacher's domicile or habitual residence and other personal privacy information.
Recently,louboutin femme prix, Ms. Fong said the public copies of the material they received after the decision is not clear, is currently being brought to the court for enforcement.
 ,louboutin homme basket;
Dialogue Judge Tang Yong
Personal privacy may conflict with the public interest
To examine whether or not the executive Publication
Express: Many people feel operator health information privacy,escarpin louboutin occasion, in the end can not be made public
Tang Yong: personal health information privacy is no doubt, but not as the presence of all government information is not public. Consent of the rightholder public, private or administrative organ believes may have a significant impact on the public interest involving commercial secrets, personal privacy, government information may be disclosed. Especially when possible conflict of interest and public administrative authorities should take the initiative to examine whether it is public rights of people can not disagree without grounds to review the decision not to make public.
Express: how to judge the teacher's health information materials belong to the government
Tang Yong: Take the present case, Baiyun District Education Bureau in performing their duties, and getting a nursery teachers recruited foreign health materials, when the entry of foreign teachers to prove physical condition, it should be regarded as acquired Baiyun District School Board Government Information. If only nursery organization of medical benefits foreign teachers do not need to Baiyun District Education Bureau for the record, it does not belong to government information under the Open Government Information.
Express: if individuals do not consent to the disclosure, after reviewing how the executive decided to open
Tang Yong: the executive judge could be reviewed. Kindergarten teachers to entry to medical, physical health as they relate to the interests of children and parents. Kindergarten teachers want to be employed health certificate reported to the Department of Education for the record, so the kindergarten teacher engaged in teaching in the application,louis vuitton occhiali da vista, can be presumed have given up teaching-related health status of individuals as proof of the right to privacy, as judged by the Department of Education should be reviewed Parents apply for public information disclosure. It should be noted that such disclosure is conditional, still pay attention to the protection of personal privacy,ceinture hermes, engage in kindergarten teaching has nothing to do with the information in order to deal with public post.
Express: now in hospital information disclosure is very much the case, what problems exist in the executive information disclosure
Tang Yong: In general, the administrative organ in Guangzhou information disclosure has done well, but there are of "public is the principle, not the exception public" principle is not in place understanding of issues, such as fear of information flow from me go out, come from all aspects of pressure. In fact, compliance, should be made public. If the application is used for other illegal purposes, since there will be other laws and regulations will be punished. There are also regulations on the disclosure of government information to understand and apply some government workers are not in place,chapeau hip hop, such that the production went lookin who, as far as trade secrets, personal privacy, the rights of people to seek public opinion does not agree that he will not increase judge decided not to open.
Express: disclosure is not open, what the focus of controversy where
Tang Yong: We all know there is a conflict does exist place. Focused on two points,chapeau nba, one is inside information, there is a process of information. Let's say that the official minutes of the meeting can not be discussed in public meetings, but according to criteria of justice, if the outside when inside information as the basis of an administrative act, it should consider whether public. For example, the EIA process expertise, and now some people Original Forced experts to responsibly stand. Some agencies did not think the public, that I can put the final results made public, and this understanding is wrong. If the EIA results based upon the advice of experts as a direct basis, rather than a reference, that these expert opinions procedural information should be made public.